2. Nationalism in India

The Emergence of National Consciousness

Unlike European nationalism, which often grew from linguistic or ethnic roots, Indian nationalism was a reactionary force. It was born out of the collective struggle against a common oppressor: British Colonialism.

The Anti-Colonial Bond

· Shared Oppression: The sense of being exploited by the British provided a "shared bond" that tied diverse groups—peasants, workers, and industrialists—together.

· Unity through Struggle: Unity was not a pre-existing condition; rather, Indians "discovered" their unity while fighting for their rights.

· Varied Experiences: While the enemy was the same, the impact of colonialism was not. A peasant's idea of freedom (freedom from high rent) was different from an industrialist's (freedom from trade restrictions).

The Role of the Congress and Gandhi

The Indian National Congress, led by Mahatma Gandhi, acted as the primary vehicle for this emerging consciousness:

· Forging Unity: Gandhi’s challenge was to bring these groups with "varied notions of freedom" under one umbrella.

· Navigating Conflict: The text acknowledges that this unity was not perfect. Internal conflicts and differing aspirations often created friction within the movement.

Focus of the Chapter (1920s Onwards)

While earlier history focused on the early 1900s, this chapter dives into the mass-mobilization era:

1. The Non-Cooperation Movement: Withdrawing support from the British.

2. The Civil Disobedience Movement: Actively breaking colonial laws.

3. The Cultural Imagination: How songs, icons, and symbols (like Bharat Mata or the Flag) turned a political movement into a deep-seated national identity.

1. The First World War, Khilafat and Non-Cooperation

The First World War (1914–1918) was a global conflict, but it triggered a catastrophic "new economic and political situation" within India. The British government treated India as a resource to fuel their war efforts, leading to a collapse of the domestic economy and widespread social unrest.

Economic Exploitation and Taxation

To fund the massive defense expenditure of the war, the British colonial government implemented aggressive financial policies that drained the Indian economy:

· War Financing: The British took huge war loans, the interest of which was essentially paid by Indian taxpayers.

· Taxation: For the first time in Indian history, Income Tax was introduced. Additionally, customs duties (taxes on trade) were hiked significantly.

· Inflation: The most direct hit to the common man was the price hike. Prices of essential goods doubled between 1913 and 1918, making basic survival a struggle for the poor.

Forced Recruitment and Rural Resentment

The war required a constant supply of "cannon fodder" (soldiers).

· The Demand for Men: British authorities turned to rural India to fill their ranks.

· Forced Recruitment: Instead of voluntary enlistment, officials used forced recruitment in villages. This caused deep-seated anger among the peasantry, as young, able-bodied men were taken away from their farms to fight in a foreign war they didn't understand.

The "Twin Disaster" (Famine and Disease)

As if the economic and military pressures weren't enough, nature dealt a final blow between 1918 and 1921.

· Crop Failure: Massive droughts led to total crop failure in many parts of India, causing acute food shortages.

· The Influenza Epidemic: A global Spanish Flu pandemic hit India simultaneously.

· Mass Mortality: The 1921 Census revealed a horrifying statistic: 12 to 13 million people (roughly the population of a small country) died due to the combination of hunger and disease.

1.1: The Idea of Satyagraha

Mahatma Gandhi returned to India in January 1915. He brought with him the novel method of Satyagraha, which he had successfully tested against the racist regime in South Africa.

· Philosophical Foundation: Satyagraha is based on the twin pillars of Truth and Non-violence. It suggests that if the struggle is against injustice, physical force is not required to defeat the oppressor.

· The Method of Persuasion: A satyagrahi seeks to win the battle by appealing to the conscience of the oppressor. Instead of being forced to accept the truth through violence, the oppressor is persuaded to see the truth.

· Early Successes in India:

o Champaran (1917): To help peasants struggling against the oppressive indigo plantation system.

o Kheda (1918): To support peasants who could not pay revenue due to crop failure and a plague epidemic.

o Ahmedabad (1918): To organize cotton mill workers for better working conditions.

1.2: The Rowlatt Act – The "Black Act"

In 1919, the British government passed the Rowlatt Act through the Imperial Legislative Council.

· The Conflict: It was passed "hurriedly" despite the united opposition of Indian members.

· The Provisions: The Act gave the government draconian powers to:

o Repress political activities.

o Detain political prisoners without trial for two years. (This violated the basic principle of justice).

· The Reaction: Gandhiji called for a Nationwide Satyagraha against these unjust laws, starting with a hartal (strike) on 6 April 1919.

· Methods of Protest: Rallies were organized, railway workers went on strike, and shops closed down.

The Jallianwalla Bagh Massacre (13 April 1919)

Alarmed by the popular upsurge and fearing the breakdown of communication lines (railways/telegraph), the British administration launched a brutal clampdown.

· Prelude to the Incident: On 10 April, police in Amritsar fired on a peaceful procession, leading to attacks on banks and post offices. Martial Law was imposed, and General Dyer took command.

· The Incident: On 13 April (Baisakhi), a large crowd gathered in the enclosed ground of Jallianwalla Bagh.

o Some were there to protest government repression.

o Others were villagers attending the Baisakhi fair, unaware of the Martial Law.

· The Act of Terror: Dyer blocked the only exit points and ordered his troops to fire on the trapped crowd, killing hundreds.

· Dyer’s Objective: He openly declared his goal was to "produce a moral effect"—to create a feeling of "terror and awe" in the minds of the satyagrahis.

· The Result: News of the massacre led to strikes and clashes across North India. The British responded with humiliating repression: forcing people to crawl on streets and rub their noses on the ground. Gandhi, seeing the movement turn into a cycle of violence, called it off.

The Khilafat Issue and the Move Toward Unity

Although the Rowlatt Satyagraha was widespread, it was still mostly limited to cities. Gandhi realized that a truly "broad-based movement" required Hindu-Muslim unity.

· The Context of Khilafat: After WWI, the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) was defeated. Rumors spread of a harsh treaty to be imposed on the Ottoman Emperor (the Khalifa), who was the spiritual leader of Muslims worldwide.

· The Committee: To protect the Khalifa’s powers, the Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay (March 1919) by Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali.

· Gandhi's Strategy: He saw the Khilafat issue as the perfect "umbrella" to bring Muslims into the national movement.

· The Resolution: At the Calcutta session of the Congress (September 1920), Gandhi convinced other leaders that India must start a Non-Cooperation Movement in support of both Khilafat and Swaraj (self-rule).

1.3: Why Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM)?

Main Concept The Logic and Adoption of Non-Cooperation

Mahatma Gandhi believed that the British did not rule India by force alone, but because Indians allowed them to. This concept moved the struggle from "asking for rights" to "withdrawing support."

The Philosophy of 'Hind Swaraj'

In his 1909 book, Hind Swaraj, Gandhiji laid out the fundamental reasoning for the movement:

· The Premise: British rule in India was established and had survived only because of the cooperation of Indians.

· The Solution: If Indians simply refused to cooperate, British rule would collapse within a year, and Swaraj (self-rule) would be achieved automatically.

The Proposed Stages of the Movement

Gandhiji did not want a chaotic protest; he proposed that the movement should unfold in a systematic, phased manner:

1. Surrender of Titles: Returning all honorary awards and titles bestowed by the British government.

2. The Boycott Phase: Refusal to participate in or use colonial institutions, including:

o Civil services, army, and police.

o Courts and Legislative Councils.

o Government schools and colleges.

o Foreign Goods: Encouraging the use of local (Swadeshi) products instead.

3. Final Stage: If the government used repression to stop the boycott, a full Civil Disobedience campaign (including non-payment of taxes) would be launched.

Key Term: Boycott – The refusal to deal and associate with people, participate in activities, or buy and use things as a form of protest.

Internal Conflict and the Nagpur Compromise

The movement did not have immediate unanimous support within the Congress. Between September and December 1920, there was an "intense tussle" (disagreement):

· Concerns of Congress Members:

o Many were reluctant to boycott the council elections scheduled for November 1920.

o There was a deep fear that the movement might lead to popular violence (similar to the post-Rowlatt events).

· The Resolution: After months of debate, the deadlock was broken at the Nagpur Session in December 1920.

· Outcome: A compromise was reached, and the Non-Cooperation programme was formally adopted by the Congress.

2. Differing Strands within the Movement

The Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement officially began in January 1921. While the entire country united under the slogan of Swaraj, the movement was not uniform. Different social groups interpreted "Swaraj" based on their own daily struggles and aspirations.

2.1: Social Participation in Towns

The movement in the cities was primarily a middle-class phenomenon. It was characterized by a massive wave of resignations and boycotts:

· Educational Boycott: Thousands of students left government-controlled schools and colleges. Headmasters and teachers resigned.

· Legal Boycott: Renowned lawyers gave up their legal practices.

· Legislative Boycott: Council elections were boycotted in most provinces.

o The Exception (Madras): The Justice Party (representing non-Brahmans) did not boycott elections. They believed that entering the council was the only way to gain the power traditionally held by Brahmans.

The Economic Impact of Non-Cooperation

The economic effects were the most "dramatic" and hit the British where it hurt most—their revenue.

· Boycott and Picket: Foreign goods were boycotted, and liquor shops were picketed (protesters blocked the entrance).

· Bonfires: Foreign cloth was discarded and burnt in huge public bonfires.

· The Numbers: The import of foreign cloth halved between 1921 and 1922. The value of imports plummeted from Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore.

· Trade Resistance: Merchants and traders refused to trade in or finance foreign trade.

· Boost to Indian Industry: As people shifted to Indian clothes, the production of Indian textile mills and handlooms saw a massive increase.

Challenges and the Slowdown in Cities

Despite the initial surge, the movement in towns began to slow down gradually due to practical and economic constraints:

1. The "Khadi" Problem: Khadi was the symbol of the movement, but it was hand-woven and expensive. Poor people could not afford it compared to the cheap, mass-produced mill cloth from Britain. They could not boycott mill cloth indefinitely.

2. Lack of Alternative Institutions: To successfully boycott British schools and courts, India needed its own alternative institutions. These were very slow to develop.

3. The "Trickle Back" Effect: Because there were no Indian schools or workplaces to go to, students, teachers, and lawyers eventually had to return to government (British) institutions to sustain their livelihoods.

Key Term: Picket – A form of demonstration or protest by which people block the entrance to a shop, factory, or office.

2.2: Rebellion in the Countryside

As the Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM) moved into rural India, it merged with existing peasant and tribal struggles. For these groups, Swaraj did not just mean self-rule, but freedom from high rents, forced labor, and forest restrictions.

The Peasant Movement in Awadh

The struggle in Awadh was directed against talukdars and landlords rather than just the British.

· The Leadership: Led by Baba Ramchandra, a sanyasi who had been an indentured laborer in Fiji.

· The Grievances:

o Exorbitant Rents: Landlords demanded extremely high rents and various cesses (taxes).

o Begar: Peasants were forced to work on landlords' farms without any payment.

o Insecurity of Tenure: Tenants were regularly evicted so they could not claim any permanent right over the land.

· Forms of Protest:

o Nai-Dhobi Bandhs: Organized by panchayats to deprive landlords of basic services like barbers and washermen.

o Oudh Kisan Sabha: Set up in October 1920, headed by Jawaharlal Nehru and Baba Ramchandra. It quickly grew to over 300 branches.

· Conflict with Congress: The movement turned violent in 1921—houses were attacked, bazaars looted, and grain hoards taken over. The Congress leadership was unhappy because the peasants used Gandhiji's name to justify violence and the non-payment of taxes.

Tribal Resistance in the Gudem Hills

In the Gudem Hills of Andhra Pradesh, the movement took the form of a militant guerrilla struggle, which was contrary to Gandhi’s principle of non-violence.

· The Grievances:

o The British had closed large forest areas, preventing tribals from grazing cattle or collecting fuelwood/fruits.

o People were forced to contribute begar for road construction.

· The Leadership of Alluri Sitaram Raju:

o Raju was a unique figure who claimed "special powers" (healing, surviving bullets) and was seen as an incarnation of God.

o He admired Gandhiji, encouraged wearing khadi, and giving up alcohol.

o The Twist: He disagreed with non-violence, asserting that India could only be liberated through the use of force.

· The Outcome: The rebels attacked police stations and attempted to kill British officials. Raju was captured and executed in 1924, becoming a legendary folk hero.

Differing Interpretations of Swaraj

A recurring theme in the countryside was the "re-interpretation" of Gandhi's message to suit local needs:

· Peasants: Believed Gandhiji had declared that land would be redistributed and taxes abolished.

· Tribals: Believed Swaraj meant the end of forest laws and the restoration of traditional rights.

· Misuse of the Mahatma's Name: Local leaders often invoked Gandhi's name to sanction actions (like looting or violence) that Gandhi himself did not approve of.

Key Term: Begar – Labor that the villager was forced to contribute without any payment.

2.3: Swaraj in the Plantations

For the laborers working in the tea gardens of Assam, the abstract concept of Swaraj translated into a very practical need: the right to freedom of movement and the reclamation of their ancestral land.

The Inland Emigration Act of 1859

The lives of plantation workers were governed by a restrictive colonial law that functioned almost like a prison system.

· The Restriction: Under the Inland Emigration Act of 1859, plantation workers were prohibited from leaving the tea gardens without official permission.

· The Reality: In practice, this permission was rarely granted, effectively keeping the workers as "confined" labor, cut off from their homes and families.

Interpretation of Gandhi Raj

When news of the Non-Cooperation Movement reached the plantations, the workers re-imagined the movement through the lens of their own suffering:

· Defiance of Authority: Thousands of workers ignored the Emigration Act, left the plantations, and headed for their home villages.

· The Myth of Land: They believed that "Gandhi Raj" was coming—a time when the British would be gone and every laborer would be granted land in their own village.

· The Tragic End: The workers never reached their homes. Due to a railway and steamer strike, they were stranded at the stations, where the police caught them and brutally beat them up.

Integration into the National Movement

Despite the local and often "incorrect" interpretations of Swaraj, these movements served a larger purpose in the struggle for independence.

· Beyond Locality: While the Congress did not define these specific visions, the workers were identifying with a movement that went beyond their immediate locality.

· Emotional Unity: By chanting Gandhiji’s name and raising slogans for "Swatantra Bharat" (Independent India), they were emotionally connecting with an all-India agitation.

· Identity: By linking their struggles to the Congress, they became part of a unified national identity, even if their specific goals were different from the official party program.

This transitional phase is critical for exams as it explains the "gap years" between the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Civil Disobedience Movement. It highlights the internal conflicts of the Congress and the external economic factors that pushed India toward the demand for "Purna Swaraj."

3. Towards Civil Disobedience

Following the withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement in February 1922, the Indian national movement underwent a period of internal debate, economic crisis, and a shift toward radical goals.

A. The Withdrawal and Internal Congress Conflict

The movement ended abruptly due to violence (specifically the Chauri Chaura incident, though not named in this specific para).

· Gandhi’s Reasoning: He felt satyagrahis were not yet ready for mass struggle and needed more training in non-violence.

· The Pro-Council Group: Leaders like C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru wanted to end the boycott of councils. They formed the Swaraj Party within the Congress to:

o Participate in provincial council elections.

o Oppose British policies from within the government.

o Prove that these councils were undemocratic.

· The Radical Group: Younger leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose rejected council politics and pushed for more intense mass agitation and full independence.

B. Two Shaping Factors of the Late 1920s

Two major events redirected Indian politics toward a new mass movement:

· Factor A: The Great Depression:

o Agricultural prices began falling in 1926 and crashed after 1930.

o Peasants could not sell their crops and found it impossible to pay government revenue.

o By 1930, the rural areas were in a state of total turmoil.

· Factor B: The Simon Commission (1928):

o The British (Tory) government sent a Statutory Commission led by Sir John Simon to review India's constitutional system.

o The Flaw: The commission had no Indian members; they were all British.

o The Protest: When it arrived in 1928, it was met with the slogan "Go back Simon." Both the Congress and the Muslim League united in protest.

C. The Shift to 'Purna Swaraj' (Full Independence)

To calm the protests, Viceroy Lord Irwin made a "vague offer" of Dominion Status in October 1929 and proposed a Round Table Conference. This did not satisfy the Congress radicals.

· The Lahore Congress (December 1929):

o Presided over by Jawaharlal Nehru.

o It formalized the demand for 'Purna Swaraj' or Full Independence.

· Independence Day (1930):

o 26 January 1930 was declared as the first "Independence Day."

o People were asked to take a pledge to struggle for complete freedom.

· The Challenge: These celebrations didn't attract much mass attention. Gandhiji realized that to start a new movement, he had to link the "abstract" idea of Purna Swaraj to concrete, everyday issues (like salt).

3.1: The Salt March and Civil Disobedience

The Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) was a major step up from Non-Cooperation. While Non-Cooperation was about "not supporting" the government, Civil Disobedience was about "breaking the law."

Salt as a Symbol and the Ultimatum

Gandhiji chose salt as the center of his campaign because it was a "universal" necessity.

· The Eleven Demands: On 31 January 1930, Gandhi sent a letter to Viceroy Irwin with 11 demands, ranging from peasant needs to industrialist interests. This ensured that all classes could identify with the movement.

· The Salt Tax: The most important demand was the abolition of the salt tax. Since salt was consumed by everyone, Gandhi argued that taxing it was the most "oppressive face" of British rule.

· The Ultimatum: Gandhi gave the British until 11 March to fulfill the demands, or face a civil disobedience campaign. Irwin refused to negotiate.

The Dandi March (12 March – 6 April 1930)

· The Journey: Gandhiji started his march from Sabarmati Ashram to the coastal town of Dandi.

· Statistics: 78 trusted volunteers, 240 miles, 24 days (10 miles per day).

· Mass Mobilization: Thousands gathered to hear Gandhi at every stop, where he preached non-violence and the meaning of Swaraj.

· The Act: On 6 April, he reached Dandi and ceremonially broke the law by manufacturing salt from seawater.

Expansion and Comparison with Non-Cooperation

The Dandi March triggered a nationwide movement. It was fundamentally different from the 1921 movement:

· Difference: In Non-Cooperation, people refused to cooperate. In Civil Disobedience, people were asked to break colonial laws.

· Spread of the Movement:

o Thousands manufactured salt and protested in front of government factories.

o Peasants: Refused to pay land revenue and chaukidari taxes.

o Forest Tribes: Violated forest laws by entering "Reserved Forests."

o Officials: Village officials resigned in large numbers.

Government Repression and the Gandhi-Irwin Pact

The British responded with fear and brutality:

· Key Arrests: Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Frontier Gandhi) was arrested in April 1930, leading to massive protests in Peshawar. Gandhi was arrested a month later.

· Violence: Industrial workers in Sholapur attacked British structures. The government responded by beating peaceful protesters (including women/children) and arresting 100,000 people.

· The Pact (5 March 1931): To stop the violence, Gandhi signed the Gandhi-Irwin Pact.

o Condition 1: Gandhi agreed to attend the Second Round Table Conference in London.

o Condition 2: The British agreed to release political prisoners.

Relaunch and Decline

The peace did not last long:

· Disappointment in London: The London conference (Dec 1931) failed to meet Indian demands.

· New Repression: Upon returning, Gandhi found Nehru and Ghaffar Khan back in jail and the Congress declared illegal.

· Final Phase: Gandhi relaunched the movement in 1932. It continued for over a year, but by 1934, it had lost its momentum and was withdrawn.

3.2: How Participants saw the Movement

The Civil Disobedience Movement was not perceived the same way by everyone. For each social group, Swaraj represented a solution to their specific economic grievances.

The Peasantry (Rich vs. Poor)

The countryside was divided by class interests, leading to a complicated relationship with the Congress.

· Rich Peasants (Patidars of Gujarat & Jats of UP):

o Reason for joining: As producers of commercial crops, they were hit hard by the Great Depression and falling prices. They couldn't pay government revenue.

o Definition of Swaraj: A struggle against high land revenue.

o Disappointment: They were deeply upset when Gandhi called off the movement in 1931 without revenue reductions. Consequently, many refused to rejoin in 1932.

· Poor Peasants:

o Reason for joining: They were small tenants who couldn't pay their rent to landlords due to the Depression.

o Demands: They wanted "no-rent" campaigns and the remission of unpaid rent.

o Congress Stance: The Congress was unwilling to support "no-rent" campaigns because they didn't want to upset the rich peasants and landlords who funded the party. This created a "gap" between poor peasants and the Congress.

The Business Class and Industrial Workers

The movement saw a push-pull dynamic between the owners of capital and the labor force.

· Business Classes (Industrialists):

o Key Organizations: Formed IICC (1920) and FICCI (1927) under leaders like G.D. Birla and Purshottamdas Thakurdas.

o Demands: Protection against foreign imports and a favorable rupee-sterling exchange rate.

o Definition of Swaraj: A time when colonial restrictions on business would end.

o Withdrawal: After the Round Table Conference failed, they grew worried about militant activities, business disruptions, and the rise of Socialism within Congress.

· Industrial Working Class:

o Participation: Generally low, except in Nagpur.

o Reason for Aloofness: As the Congress grew closer to the industrialists, the workers felt neglected.

o Selective Participation: Some workers in Chotanagpur mines or railway/dockworkers participated by wearing Gandhi caps and boycotting foreign goods to protest low wages.

o Congress Stance: Congress hesitated to include worker demands to avoid alienating the rich industrialists.

The Role of Women

One of the most significant features of the Civil Disobedience Movement was the large-scale participation of women.

· Activities: Thousands of women participated in salt manufacturing, protest marches, and picketing liquor/foreign cloth shops.

· Background:

o Urban areas: Mostly from high-caste families.

o Rural areas: Mostly from rich peasant households.

· The Contradiction: While they saw service to the nation as a "sacred duty," the social structure didn't change much.

o Gandhiji's View: He believed women's primary duty was "home and hearth" (being good mothers/wives).

o Congress Stance: The organization was reluctant to give women positions of authority; they preferred their "symbolic presence" for a long time.

3.3: The Limits of Civil Disobedience

The movement faced "limits" because certain large social groups—specifically Dalits and sections of the Muslim community—felt that their specific interests were not being protected by the Congress’s vision of Swaraj.

The Dalit Participation and the Poona Pact

By the 1930s, the "untouchables" began calling themselves Dalit (oppressed). Their participation in CDM was limited, especially in Maharashtra, due to a clash of ideologies.

· Congress & the Sanatanis: For a long time, the Congress ignored Dalits to avoid offending the Sanatanis (conservative high-caste Hindus).

· Gandhiji’s Approach:

o Declared Swaraj was impossible without ending untouchability.

o Called them Harijan (Children of God).

o Organized satyagrahas for their entry into temples and access to public facilities.

· Ambedkar’s Political Solution: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar believed only political empowerment could resolve social disabilities. He demanded:

1. Reserved seats in educational institutions.

2. Separate Electorates for Dalits.

· The Conflict: Ambedkar (leading the Depressed Classes Association) clashed with Gandhi at the Second Round Table Conference over separate electorates.

· The Poona Pact (September 1932):

o After the British granted separate electorates, Gandhi went on a fast unto death, fearing it would divide society forever.

o The Result: Ambedkar agreed to Gandhi's position. Dalits got reserved seats in provincial and central councils, but they were to be voted in by the general electorate (all people), not just Dalits.

Communal Relations and Muslim Alienation

After the Non-Cooperation-Khilafat movement declined, many Muslims felt alienated from the Congress, leading to a "lukewarm" response to Civil Disobedience.

· Religious Friction: From the mid-1920s, the Congress became visibly associated with Hindu groups like the Hindu Mahasabha. This led to communal clashes and riots in many cities.

· The Representation Dispute: The main conflict was over how Muslims would be represented in future assemblies.

· Jinnah’s Proposal: Muhammad Ali Jinnah was willing to give up "separate electorates" if:

1. Muslims were assured reserved seats in the Central Assembly.

2. Representation in Bengal and Punjab was in proportion to the Muslim population.

· The Failure of 1928: All hope for a compromise ended at the All Parties Conference when M.R. Jayakar of the Hindu Mahasabha strongly opposed these concessions.

Atmosphere of Suspicion

When the CDM finally launched, it was shadowed by "distrust and suspicion."

· Minority Fears: Muslim leaders feared that their culture and identity would be "submerged" under the domination of a Hindu majority.

· Result: Large sections of the Muslim community did not respond to the call for a united struggle, fearing that the Congress-led movement only represented Hindu interests.

4. The Sense of Collective Belonging

Nationalism spreads when people believe they share a common identity. While united struggles (like Non-Cooperation) brought people together, cultural processes captured their hearts and imaginations.

Identity through Images (Bharat Mata)

Just as "Germania" or "Marianne" represented European nations, the identity of India was personified in the image of Bharat Mata.

· Creation: The image was first conceptualized by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in the 1870s. He also wrote ‘Vande Mataram’ as a hymn to the motherland.

· Abanindranath Tagore’s Painting: In 1905, influenced by the Swadeshi movement, he painted Bharat Mata as an ascetic figure—portraying her as calm, divine, and spiritual.

· Significance: Showing devotion to this mother figure became a symbol of one's nationalism. Over time, the image evolved into many forms in popular prints.

Revival of Indian Folklore

Nationalists believed that true Indian culture survived in the villages, protected from the "corrupting" influence of the British.

· The Movement: Nationalists traveled to villages to record folk songs, ballads, and legends. They believed these tales restored a sense of pride in one’s past.

· Key Figures:

o Rabindranath Tagore (Bengal): Led the movement by collecting nursery rhymes, myths, and ballads.

o Natesa Sastri (Madras): Published a massive four-volume collection called The Folklore of Southern India. He argued that folklore was "the most trustworthy manifestation of people’s real thoughts."

Icons and Symbols (National Flags)

Symbols like flags provided a visual focus for the movement and inspired a feeling of defiance.

· The Swadeshi Flag (1905): A tricolour of red, green, and yellow. It featured:

o Eight Lotuses: Representing the eight provinces of British India.

o Crescent Moon: Representing Hindu-Muslim unity.

· The Swaraj Flag (1921): Designed by Gandhiji. It was a tricolour of red, green, and white.

o Spinning Wheel (Charkha): Placed in the centre to represent the Gandhian ideal of self-help.

· Usage: Carrying the flag during marches became a symbol of resistance against British authority.

Reinterpretation of History

The British portrayed Indian history as a record of backwardness and inability to self-govern. Indian nationalists fought this narrative.

· Glorifying the Past: Nationalists wrote about the "Golden Age" of ancient India when science, mathematics, art, and philosophy flourished.

· The Narrative of Decline: They argued that this glorious era was ended by colonization.

· The Call to Action: These histories urged Indians to take pride in their past and struggle to change their miserable present under British rule.

The Limitations of Cultural Nationalism

While these cultural efforts unified many, they also created new divisions:

· Problem of Exclusion: Most of the images, icons, and historical stories were drawn from Hindu iconography and ancient Hindu history.

· Effect: This made people of other communities, particularly Muslims, feel left out of the national narrative, complicating the goal of total unity.

This final "box item" in the chapter is a favorite for 3-mark and 5-mark questions. It describes the final, most intense phase of the struggle for independence.

The Quit India Movement (1942)

The Quit India Movement (August Kranti) was the most spontaneous and massive struggle in the history of Indian nationalism, characterized by the slogan "Do or Die."

Origins and the "Quit India" Resolution

Two major factors led to this radical step:

1. Failure of the Cripps Mission: The mission failed to provide a clear path to Indian independence.

2. Effects of World War II: Economic hardships and the threat of invasion caused widespread discontent.

· The Wardha Meeting (14 July 1942): The Congress Working Committee passed the resolution demanding an immediate British withdrawal.

· The Bombay Endorsement (8 August 1942): The All India Congress Committee (AICC) officially launched the movement from Gowalia Tank, Bombay.

"Do or Die" and Mass Participation

Gandhiji's message was more assertive than ever before:

· The Mantra: Gandhiji delivered the famous "Do or Die" speech, signaling that this was the final push for freedom.

· A "Standstill": The movement was so intense that the state machinery in many parts of India effectively stopped functioning.

· Nature of Protest: It was a true mass movement. Thousands of ordinary people—students, workers, and peasants—participated in hartals, demonstrations, and processions.

Leadership and Regional Heroes

While many top leaders were arrested early on, a new generation of leaders and regional heroes kept the movement alive:

· National Leaders: Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali, and Ram Manohar Lohia.

· Women's Leadership:

o Matangini Hazra (Bengal)

o Kanaklata Barua (Assam)

o Rama Devi (Odisha)

British Repression

The British government used extreme force to crush the rebellion.

· They used "much force" and mass arrests.

· Despite the brutal crackdown, it took the British more than a year to fully suppress the movement.

Conclusion

The Indian national movement was not a straight line to success; it was a constant balancing act. The "nation" that emerged was not a single, silent block, but a collection of "many voices" with a common enemy.

The Role of the Congress and Gandhi

The Indian National Congress, particularly under Mahatma Gandhi, acted as the centralizing force of the movement.

· Channeling Grievances: The Congress didn't create the anger; they "channeled" the pre-existing, widespread anger against colonial rule into organized movements.

· Forging Unity: Their primary goal was to take localized, specific complaints (like high rent in Awadh or salt taxes) and turn them into a singular "National Unity."

Varied Aspirations and the "Meaning of Freedom"

A critical takeaway for the board exam is that Swaraj was a subjective term.

· Diverse Expectations: Because the grievances were different (Peasants vs. Industrialists, Dalits vs. Sanatanis), "Freedom from colonial rule" meant different things to different people.

· The Struggle of Interpretation: For a worker, it was wages; for a rich peasant, it was revenue; for a tribal, it was forest access.

The Cycle of Unity and Disunity

The movement was characterized by "High Points" and "Phases of Disunity."

· The Balancing Act: The Congress tried to ensure the demands of one group (e.g., Workers) did not alienate another (e.g., Industrialists).

· Breakdowns: Because it was impossible to satisfy everyone simultaneously, the unity often broke down, leading to internal conflict.

· Conclusion of the Era: What was born was a nation with many voices. The movement's success lay not in making everyone the same, but in bringing these many voices together against a common colonial government.

**********

EXERCISE

1. Short Explanations

a) Nationalism and Anti-Colonial Movement

In colonies, the growth of modern nationalism is intimately connected to the anti-colonial movement.

· People discovered their unity in the process of their struggle with colonialism.

· The sense of being oppressed under a common enemy provided a shared bond that tied many different groups together.

b) First World War and the National Movement

The war created a new economic and political situation:

· Economic: Forced recruitment, huge defense expenditure, doubling of prices (1913-1918), and introduction of income tax led to extreme hardship.

· Natural Disasters: Crop failures and the 1921 influenza epidemic killed 12-13 million people.

· Disillusionment: People hoped their hardships would end after the war, but when they didn't, the ground was fertile for a mass movement.

c) Outrage over the Rowlatt Act

Indians were outraged because the Act was passed hurriedly through the Imperial Legislative Council despite united Indian opposition. It gave the government enormous powers to repress political activities and allowed detention of political prisoners without trial for two years.

d) Withdrawal of Non-Cooperation Movement

In February 1922, Gandhiji called off the movement because:

· It was turning violent in many places (notably the Chauri Chaura incident).

· He felt that Satyagrahis needed to be properly trained in non-violence before they were ready for a mass struggle.

2. The Idea of Satyagraha

Satyagraha is a novel method of mass agitation based on truth and non-violence.

· It suggests that if the cause is true and the struggle is against injustice, physical force is not necessary.

· A Satyagrahi wins by appealing to the conscience of the oppressor, persuading them to see the truth rather than forcing them through violence.

3. Newspaper Reports (Brief)

a) The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

AMRITSAR, 13 APRIL 1919: Today, a peaceful gathering at Jallianwala Bagh turned into a bloodbath. General Dyer entered the enclosed ground, blocked all exits, and opened fire on thousands of men, women, and children. Dyer later claimed his object was to "produce a moral effect" of terror. The nation is in shock as martial law tightens its grip on Punjab.

b) The Simon Commission

BOMBAY, 1928: The Statutory Commission led by Sir John Simon arrived today to a sea of black flags. Protesters chanted "Go Back Simon!" All political parties, including Congress and the League, have boycotted the commission because it does not include a single Indian member, an insult to our right to self-determination.

4. Comparing Bharat Mata and Germania

Feature	Bharat Mata (India)	Germania (Germany)
Appearance	Ascetic, calm, divine, and spiritual.	Heroic, powerful, wearing a crown of oak leaves.
Symbols	Holds beads, cloth, and books (knowledge/purity).	Holds a sword and shield (readiness to fight).
Message	Emphasizes tradition, peace, and maternal care.	Emphasizes strength, bravery, and liberty.

Project: Discussion Points

1. Social Groups in NCM (Choose 3)

1. Middle Class (Towns): Joined to boycott British education and legal systems.

2. Peasants (Awadh): Led by Baba Ramchandra; struggled against high rents and begar.

3. Plantation Workers (Assam): Sought freedom of movement and land in their own villages under "Gandhi Raj."

2. The Salt March as a Symbol

The Salt March was effective because Salt was a universal necessity consumed by rich and poor alike. By breaking the salt law, Gandhi revealed the oppressive face of British rule in a way that every Indian, regardless of class, could understand and relate to.

3. Experience as a Woman in CDM

"Participating in the Civil Disobedience Movement made me feel that service to the nation is a sacred duty. I stepped out of the 'home and hearth' to picket liquor shops and manufacture salt. Though the Congress is hesitant to give us authority, being in the streets with thousands of others has given me a sense of pride and identity beyond my household."

4. Separate Electorates Conflict

Leaders differed because Dalit leaders (Ambedkar) believed political empowerment through separate electorates was the only way to resolve social disabilities. Gandhiji opposed this, fearing it would divisive society and slow down the integration of Dalits into the national mainstream.

Comparison: India vs. Indo-China

· Similarity: Both movements were sparked by anti-colonialism and a sense of collective identity formed against European powers (British in India, French in Indo-China).

· Contrast: India’s movement was largely characterized by Gandhian non-violence and civil disobedience. In contrast, Indo-China’s struggle (led by Ho Chi Minh) involved more intense militant guerrilla warfare and communist ideologies to achieve independence.